RE: [opendx-dev] rpm spec file

["David L. Thompson" <dthompsn@cs.umt.edu>]

I agree. I think it is fair to just put the MSVC files directly in 
the cvs tree. Since they are not going to affect anything else.

David

>You may add MSVC projects files in CVS.  Maybe under Windows directory?
>Best would be to add these file in the respective driectory
>and the dx.dsw in dx (root).  Sicne these are text files they should not
>affect other platforms.
>
>I would prefer MSVC project files. Once users start using your MSVC
>wrappers, I am affraid
>mailing list might get flooded with questions.
>
>Suhaib
>
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: owner-opendx-dev@opendx.watson.ibm.com
>>  [mailto:owner-opendx-dev@opendx.watson.ibm.com]On Behalf Of
>>  gabra@us.ibm.com
>>  Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 9:22 PM
>>  To: opendx-dev@opendx.watson.ibm.com
>>  Subject: Re: [opendx-dev] rpm spec file
>>
>>
>>  Sounds reasonable to me.  What do y'all think about MSVC project
>>  files?  It
>>  requires a file in the root and separate files in each C/C++ source leaf.
>>  Isn't there a way to handle it as a separate module in CVS.
>>  Should they be
>>  distributed in the source tarball, or some other way?
>>
>  > Greg
>>
-- 
.............................................................................
David L. Thompson                          The University of Montana
mailto:dthompsn@cs.umt.edu                 Computer Science Department
http://www.cs.umt.edu/u/dthompsn           Missoula, MT  59812
                                            Work Phone : (406)257-8530